<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Communication Issues and Corporate Blogs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fastwonderblog.com/2009/01/21/communication-issues-and-corporate-blogs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fastwonderblog.com/2009/01/21/communication-issues-and-corporate-blogs/</link>
	<description>Thoughts on online community strategy, community management, blogging, social media, Yahoo Pipes and open source.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 00:59:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryan Person</title>
		<link>http://fastwonderblog.com/2009/01/21/communication-issues-and-corporate-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-83668</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryan Person</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2009 04:04:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fastwonderblog.com/?p=915#comment-83668</guid>
		<description>Dawn:

Thought I&#039;d share the social media guidelines I created for LiveWorld employees. 
http://budurl.com/LWSMGuidelines

I think they&#039;re pretty straightforward, and that they help guide employees in their online content creation on blogs and social networks. 

Essentially, when employees are writing/commenting about company-related matters or industry issues, they need to identify themselves and their company affiliation.
And if they&#039;re blogging on their own sites, they need to put a disclaimer that their opinions are their own, and don&#039;t necessarily reflect the official views of the company.

However, as we point out in the guidelines, employees should always be mindful that their writing/comments/etc. can be considered a reflection of their company. After all, remember the Robert Scoble example. As much as he would say that he wasn&#039;t an official spokesperson for Microsoft, he was certainly a de-facto one.  He helped give Microsoft an online personality and voice that it had lacked.

So, the &quot;official&quot; vs. &quot;opinion&quot; content can&#039;t always be so neatly separated. Many people naturally lump these two categories into one, and it&#039;s a reality companies need to consider when drafting social media guidelines for their employees.

Bryan &#124; @BryanPerson
LiveWorld</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dawn:</p>
<p>Thought I&#8217;d share the social media guidelines I created for LiveWorld employees.<br />
<a href="http://budurl.com/LWSMGuidelines" rel="nofollow">http://budurl.com/LWSMGuidelines</a></p>
<p>I think they&#8217;re pretty straightforward, and that they help guide employees in their online content creation on blogs and social networks. </p>
<p>Essentially, when employees are writing/commenting about company-related matters or industry issues, they need to identify themselves and their company affiliation.<br />
And if they&#8217;re blogging on their own sites, they need to put a disclaimer that their opinions are their own, and don&#8217;t necessarily reflect the official views of the company.</p>
<p>However, as we point out in the guidelines, employees should always be mindful that their writing/comments/etc. can be considered a reflection of their company. After all, remember the Robert Scoble example. As much as he would say that he wasn&#8217;t an official spokesperson for Microsoft, he was certainly a de-facto one.  He helped give Microsoft an online personality and voice that it had lacked.</p>
<p>So, the &#8220;official&#8221; vs. &#8220;opinion&#8221; content can&#8217;t always be so neatly separated. Many people naturally lump these two categories into one, and it&#8217;s a reality companies need to consider when drafting social media guidelines for their employees.</p>
<p>Bryan | @BryanPerson<br />
LiveWorld</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Suggested Reading - Jan 23, 2009 &#171; Sazbean</title>
		<link>http://fastwonderblog.com/2009/01/21/communication-issues-and-corporate-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-83458</link>
		<dc:creator>Suggested Reading - Jan 23, 2009 &#171; Sazbean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 13:31:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fastwonderblog.com/?p=915#comment-83458</guid>
		<description>[...] Communication Issues and Corporate Blogs (Fast Wonder) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Communication Issues and Corporate Blogs (Fast Wonder) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Mauer</title>
		<link>http://fastwonderblog.com/2009/01/21/communication-issues-and-corporate-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-83373</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Mauer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 01:49:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fastwonderblog.com/?p=915#comment-83373</guid>
		<description>Good point about the hosting, John. Microsoft has a couple sites (like http://blogs.msdn.com/ ) for employee blogs, but I decided to host on my own domain in large part because of the perception of it. I wanted to make clear that the words were my own. (And if things get ugly, I know I have control over my own site.)

Along with that was the decision around how much personal stuff to mix in with work-related posts. In thinking about it, I found that the blogs I enjoyed reading the most were the ones that weren&#039;t just about the latest service pack or techie tip, but covered the gamut of that person&#039;s interests. Scott Hanselman (http://www.hanselman.com/ )is a good example; he has had some great posts about his time in Africa, his family, or his dealings with diabetes that I&#039;ve found very interesting. Besides getting to know the person better and learning something new every once in a while, I think this also helps to clarify that these are your words, not your company&#039;s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point about the hosting, John. Microsoft has a couple sites (like <a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.msdn.com/</a> ) for employee blogs, but I decided to host on my own domain in large part because of the perception of it. I wanted to make clear that the words were my own. (And if things get ugly, I know I have control over my own site.)</p>
<p>Along with that was the decision around how much personal stuff to mix in with work-related posts. In thinking about it, I found that the blogs I enjoyed reading the most were the ones that weren&#8217;t just about the latest service pack or techie tip, but covered the gamut of that person&#8217;s interests. Scott Hanselman (<a href="http://www.hanselman.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.hanselman.com/</a> )is a good example; he has had some great posts about his time in Africa, his family, or his dealings with diabetes that I&#8217;ve found very interesting. Besides getting to know the person better and learning something new every once in a while, I think this also helps to clarify that these are your words, not your company&#8217;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Norris</title>
		<link>http://fastwonderblog.com/2009/01/21/communication-issues-and-corporate-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-83322</link>
		<dc:creator>John Norris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 17:40:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fastwonderblog.com/?p=915#comment-83322</guid>
		<description>An alternative is to have the blog hosted on a non-company associated site.  Perhaps a site associated with the industry or vocation.  

One would still need to make sure (using the ideas you noted) that the everyone knows the author is speaking for themselves only.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An alternative is to have the blog hosted on a non-company associated site.  Perhaps a site associated with the industry or vocation.  </p>
<p>One would still need to make sure (using the ideas you noted) that the everyone knows the author is speaking for themselves only.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Inside Network Redux &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Bookmarks for January 21st, 2009 from 00:56 to 13:09</title>
		<link>http://fastwonderblog.com/2009/01/21/communication-issues-and-corporate-blogs/comment-page-1/#comment-83061</link>
		<dc:creator>Inside Network Redux &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Bookmarks for January 21st, 2009 from 00:56 to 13:09</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 22:00:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fastwonderblog.com/?p=915#comment-83061</guid>
		<description>[...] Communication Issues and Corporate Blogs at Fast Wonder Blog: Consulting, Online Communities, and So... - [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Communication Issues and Corporate Blogs at Fast Wonder Blog: Consulting, Online Communities, and So&#8230; &#8211; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

