<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: FriendFeed Stats and Analysis</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fastwonderblog.com/2008/03/26/friendfeed-stats-and-analysis/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fastwonderblog.com/2008/03/26/friendfeed-stats-and-analysis/</link>
	<description>Consulting services for companies wanting to engage with online communities through social media.Focused on online communities, open technologies, open source, web 2.0, social media, RSS, blogging, and podcasting.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 17:32:24 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dawn</title>
		<link>http://fastwonderblog.com/2008/03/26/friendfeed-stats-and-analysis/#comment-9571</link>
		<dc:creator>Dawn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 16:27:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fastwonderblog.com/2008/03/26/friendfeed-stats-and-analysis/#comment-9571</guid>
		<description>Tibor - thanks for the pointer! I'm happy to see people working to integrate content between the original source and FriendFeed. I think this makes using FriendFeed more valuable when the content is aggregated back to the source.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tibor - thanks for the pointer! I&#8217;m happy to see people working to integrate content between the original source and FriendFeed. I think this makes using FriendFeed more valuable when the content is aggregated back to the source.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tibor</title>
		<link>http://fastwonderblog.com/2008/03/26/friendfeed-stats-and-analysis/#comment-9567</link>
		<dc:creator>Tibor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 14:37:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fastwonderblog.com/2008/03/26/friendfeed-stats-and-analysis/#comment-9567</guid>
		<description>There is also a WordPress plugin to route commnents on blogposts that are aggregated into FriendFeed, back to the related post:
http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/friendfeed-comments/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is also a WordPress plugin to route commnents on blogposts that are aggregated into FriendFeed, back to the related post:<br />
<a href="http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/friendfeed-comments/" rel="nofollow">http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/friendfeed-comments/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron B. Hockley</title>
		<link>http://fastwonderblog.com/2008/03/26/friendfeed-stats-and-analysis/#comment-8235</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron B. Hockley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 03:31:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fastwonderblog.com/2008/03/26/friendfeed-stats-and-analysis/#comment-8235</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the Ma.gnolia info, perhaps I'll check out that extension and things have improved since I looked at the situation a few months ago.  I'll be honest that I really don't use the social aspect of del.icio.us very much... I pretty much just bookmark things for myself, the only real social side is that I subscribe to some search feeds.  Perhaps if I was into more link-swapping with friends I'd be more drawn to Ma.gnolia (or perhaps not... I don't really know since that's not how I use the service).

You're right Dawn, everyone has their own uses, sounds like you're quite happy with Ma.gnolia and I'm pretty happy with del.icio.us.  Nothing wrong with that.  But I love being talked into some new tool... it just hasn't happened with Ma.gnolia.  At one point Marshall K was talking about doing a "why I like Ma.gnolia better than del.icio.us" post with some specifics, maybe I'll have to bug him again...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the Ma.gnolia info, perhaps I&#8217;ll check out that extension and things have improved since I looked at the situation a few months ago.  I&#8217;ll be honest that I really don&#8217;t use the social aspect of del.icio.us very much&#8230; I pretty much just bookmark things for myself, the only real social side is that I subscribe to some search feeds.  Perhaps if I was into more link-swapping with friends I&#8217;d be more drawn to Ma.gnolia (or perhaps not&#8230; I don&#8217;t really know since that&#8217;s not how I use the service).</p>
<p>You&#8217;re right Dawn, everyone has their own uses, sounds like you&#8217;re quite happy with Ma.gnolia and I&#8217;m pretty happy with del.icio.us.  Nothing wrong with that.  But I love being talked into some new tool&#8230; it just hasn&#8217;t happened with Ma.gnolia.  At one point Marshall K was talking about doing a &#8220;why I like Ma.gnolia better than del.icio.us&#8221; post with some specifics, maybe I&#8217;ll have to bug him again&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dawn</title>
		<link>http://fastwonderblog.com/2008/03/26/friendfeed-stats-and-analysis/#comment-8226</link>
		<dc:creator>Dawn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 22:46:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fastwonderblog.com/2008/03/26/friendfeed-stats-and-analysis/#comment-8226</guid>
		<description>I have a Ma.gnolia button on my toolbar that lets me easily add the current page to Ma.gnolia along with description, tags, etc.

I started using Ma.gnolia fairly early, mainly because Ma.gnolia supported OpenID, and many of my friends were using it, too. With any of these sites where the social aspect is important, we tend to go where our friends are. It even allowed me to easily export everything from del.icio.us to make the switch quickly. 

We all get used to our tools and each have different features that we think are the most important. I'm a big fan of picking the tool that works for you. I just happen to like Ma.gnolia :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a Ma.gnolia button on my toolbar that lets me easily add the current page to Ma.gnolia along with description, tags, etc.</p>
<p>I started using Ma.gnolia fairly early, mainly because Ma.gnolia supported OpenID, and many of my friends were using it, too. With any of these sites where the social aspect is important, we tend to go where our friends are. It even allowed me to easily export everything from del.icio.us to make the switch quickly. </p>
<p>We all get used to our tools and each have different features that we think are the most important. I&#8217;m a big fan of picking the tool that works for you. I just happen to like Ma.gnolia <img src='http://fastwonderblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Lascurettes</title>
		<link>http://fastwonderblog.com/2008/03/26/friendfeed-stats-and-analysis/#comment-8224</link>
		<dc:creator>John Lascurettes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 21:57:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fastwonderblog.com/2008/03/26/friendfeed-stats-and-analysis/#comment-8224</guid>
		<description>Aaron, regarding Ma.gnolia and FF add-ons, there are add-ons for FF. I have buttons that allow me bookmark with a toolbar button. There's even a sidebar item that works with ma.gnolia and many other bookmark sites, not just de.icio.us: https://addons.mozilla.org/de/firefox/addon/5478

I prefer ma.gnolia because of signal:noise is much better for my tastes compared to de.icio.us (that may be a side-product of being the fringe player). And the interface is aesthetically a pleasure to use, whereas on del.icio.us, not so much. 

Del.icio.us is the household name. Ma.gnolia is the tool I want to use. PC v. Mac I guess (I'm a Mac user).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aaron, regarding Ma.gnolia and FF add-ons, there are add-ons for FF. I have buttons that allow me bookmark with a toolbar button. There&#8217;s even a sidebar item that works with ma.gnolia and many other bookmark sites, not just de.icio.us: <a href="https://addons.mozilla.org/de/firefox/addon/5478" rel="nofollow">https://addons.mozilla.org/de/firefox/addon/5478</a></p>
<p>I prefer ma.gnolia because of signal:noise is much better for my tastes compared to de.icio.us (that may be a side-product of being the fringe player). And the interface is aesthetically a pleasure to use, whereas on del.icio.us, not so much. </p>
<p>Del.icio.us is the household name. Ma.gnolia is the tool I want to use. PC v. Mac I guess (I&#8217;m a Mac user).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron B. Hockley</title>
		<link>http://fastwonderblog.com/2008/03/26/friendfeed-stats-and-analysis/#comment-8217</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron B. Hockley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 20:52:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fastwonderblog.com/2008/03/26/friendfeed-stats-and-analysis/#comment-8217</guid>
		<description>re: Ma.gnolia and why I don't use it: the del.icio.us Firefox extension kicks ass.  I can bookmark everything with a toolbar button, entirely within Firefox - I never visit the website.  Similarly, I can browse and search all of my del.icio.us bookmarks from the Firefox sidebar.  Ma.gnolia is pretty, but when it comes to bookmarking I'm going to favor function over eye candy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>re: Ma.gnolia and why I don&#8217;t use it: the del.icio.us Firefox extension kicks ass.  I can bookmark everything with a toolbar button, entirely within Firefox - I never visit the website.  Similarly, I can browse and search all of my del.icio.us bookmarks from the Firefox sidebar.  Ma.gnolia is pretty, but when it comes to bookmarking I&#8217;m going to favor function over eye candy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
