<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Defining Online Community</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fastwonderblog.com/2007/12/28/defining-online-community/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fastwonderblog.com/2007/12/28/defining-online-community/</link>
	<description>Consulting services for companies wanting to engage with online communities through social media.Focused on online communities, open technologies, open source, web 2.0, social media, RSS, blogging, and podcasting.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 18:38:55 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jeremiah Owyang</title>
		<link>http://fastwonderblog.com/2007/12/28/defining-online-community/#comment-2269</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremiah Owyang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 21:33:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fastwonderblog.com/2007/12/28/defining-online-community/#comment-2269</guid>
		<description>I agree using webtools is not good either. I updated my definition on my blog (see update 2)

It's a working definition, so it will change.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree using webtools is not good either. I updated my definition on my blog (see update 2)</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a working definition, so it will change.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PO8</title>
		<link>http://fastwonderblog.com/2007/12/28/defining-online-community/#comment-2260</link>
		<dc:creator>PO8</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 18:31:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fastwonderblog.com/2007/12/28/defining-online-community/#comment-2260</guid>
		<description>"using web tools" not so good.  There are still online communities that don't really use the web at all, hard as that is to believe in 2007+; email lists and IRC are the most popular alternate venues, but I'd count Usenet newsgroups in there too.

How about "A community is a group of people who regularly communicate amongst themselves and self-identify as a community.  Common characteristics of a community include: an accepted community name; a shared goal, project, or cause;  and personal or professional relationships between the members. In an online community, the dominant portion of community communication is over a computer network."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;using web tools&#8221; not so good.  There are still online communities that don&#8217;t really use the web at all, hard as that is to believe in 2007+; email lists and IRC are the most popular alternate venues, but I&#8217;d count Usenet newsgroups in there too.</p>
<p>How about &#8220;A community is a group of people who regularly communicate amongst themselves and self-identify as a community.  Common characteristics of a community include: an accepted community name; a shared goal, project, or cause;  and personal or professional relationships between the members. In an online community, the dominant portion of community communication is over a computer network.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
