<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Who &#8220;Owns&#8221; the Community</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fastwonderblog.com/2007/12/18/who-owns-the-community/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fastwonderblog.com/2007/12/18/who-owns-the-community/</link>
	<description>Consulting services in online community strategy, community management, blogging, social media, Yahoo Pipes, open source, and web 2.0.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 10:23:49 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Why #4: Distributing Ownership</title>
		<link>http://fastwonderblog.com/2007/12/18/who-owns-the-community/comment-page-1/#comment-55318</link>
		<dc:creator>Why #4: Distributing Ownership</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 17:52:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fastwonderblog.com/2007/12/18/who-owns-the-community/#comment-55318</guid>
		<description>[...] Who &#8220;Owns&#8221; the Community?      Share and Enjoy: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Who &#8220;Owns&#8221; the Community?      Share and Enjoy: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dawn</title>
		<link>http://fastwonderblog.com/2007/12/18/who-owns-the-community/comment-page-1/#comment-1704</link>
		<dc:creator>Dawn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 04:54:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fastwonderblog.com/2007/12/18/who-owns-the-community/#comment-1704</guid>
		<description>Bill,

I think you had a pretty good definition of ownership in the video, but I&#039;m not sure your definition came across clearly in Jeremiah&#039;s post about the video.  

The whole question of &quot;ownership&quot; in communities is such a murky one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill,</p>
<p>I think you had a pretty good definition of ownership in the video, but I&#8217;m not sure your definition came across clearly in Jeremiah&#8217;s post about the video.  </p>
<p>The whole question of &#8220;ownership&#8221; in communities is such a murky one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Johnston</title>
		<link>http://fastwonderblog.com/2007/12/18/who-owns-the-community/comment-page-1/#comment-1696</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Johnston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 03:39:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fastwonderblog.com/2007/12/18/who-owns-the-community/#comment-1696</guid>
		<description>Hi Dawn,

Thanks for the thoughtful analysis here. When I say &quot;own&quot;, I do mean it in the sense of being responsible for stewarding a community, at least from an organization&#039;s perspective. It&#039;s like a dinner party... who &quot;owns&quot; it? No one. It&#039;s an absurd thing to even consider. But the host is responsible for a clean, well lit space, with great food and drinks, and ensuring a good mix of people.

I agree with your statement about developer an open source communities... although I have an example from Autodesk of an open source community being stewarded by product marketing staff.

It will be interesting to see how this issue evolves in 2008!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Dawn,</p>
<p>Thanks for the thoughtful analysis here. When I say &#8220;own&#8221;, I do mean it in the sense of being responsible for stewarding a community, at least from an organization&#8217;s perspective. It&#8217;s like a dinner party&#8230; who &#8220;owns&#8221; it? No one. It&#8217;s an absurd thing to even consider. But the host is responsible for a clean, well lit space, with great food and drinks, and ensuring a good mix of people.</p>
<p>I agree with your statement about developer an open source communities&#8230; although I have an example from Autodesk of an open source community being stewarded by product marketing staff.</p>
<p>It will be interesting to see how this issue evolves in 2008!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Owning communities and marketing in social media</title>
		<link>http://fastwonderblog.com/2007/12/18/who-owns-the-community/comment-page-1/#comment-1684</link>
		<dc:creator>Owning communities and marketing in social media</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 22:40:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fastwonderblog.com/2007/12/18/who-owns-the-community/#comment-1684</guid>
		<description>[...] inanimate things like brands. Bill Johnston thinks a brand can and should own* a community. Dawn seems to think that having some self-owned communities is a good idea (and therefore the inverse is true: brands [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] inanimate things like brands. Bill Johnston thinks a brand can and should own* a community. Dawn seems to think that having some self-owned communities is a good idea (and therefore the inverse is true: brands [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
