<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Web 2.0, Data Gathering, and Flickr</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fastwonderblog.com/2006/11/21/web-20-data-gathering-and-flickr/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fastwonderblog.com/2006/11/21/web-20-data-gathering-and-flickr/</link>
	<description>Thoughts on online community strategy, community management, blogging, social media, Yahoo Pipes and open source.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 00:59:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan</title>
		<link>http://fastwonderblog.com/2006/11/21/web-20-data-gathering-and-flickr/comment-page-1/#comment-369</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2006 22:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fastwonderblog.com/?p=242#comment-369</guid>
		<description>Web 2.0 meet contentpop.com...&lt;br /&gt;contentpop is the newest web 2.0 site, similar to digg.com, but also very different.  I enjoy using contentpop over digg for several reasons. First of which is the ease of use. I can go to contentpop, type in what I want to find, and I am taken to a list of communities, not just pages and pages of links. These user generated communities were built into this site to put the SOCIAL back into &#039;social networking&#039; Users add content to communities and share them with others that have the same interests. The second reason that I believe contentpop is better is because you can delete content if you find it unsuitable, out of place, or if the link doesn&#039;t work. This also makes the site easier to navigate because you don&#039;t have to sift through links that don&#039;t even exist. Come and judge the site for yourself, but I&#039;m sure you will enjoy it! &lt;br /&gt;www.ContentPop.com&lt;br /&gt;Here is one of my communities:  &lt;br /&gt;http://www.contentpop.com/Community/George_Bush_isms.aspx</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Web 2.0 meet contentpop.com&#8230;<br />contentpop is the newest web 2.0 site, similar to digg.com, but also very different.  I enjoy using contentpop over digg for several reasons. First of which is the ease of use. I can go to contentpop, type in what I want to find, and I am taken to a list of communities, not just pages and pages of links. These user generated communities were built into this site to put the SOCIAL back into &#8216;social networking&#8217; Users add content to communities and share them with others that have the same interests. The second reason that I believe contentpop is better is because you can delete content if you find it unsuitable, out of place, or if the link doesn&#8217;t work. This also makes the site easier to navigate because you don&#8217;t have to sift through links that don&#8217;t even exist. Come and judge the site for yourself, but I&#8217;m sure you will enjoy it! <br /><a href="http://www.ContentPop.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.ContentPop.com</a><br />Here is one of my communities:  <br /><a href="http://www.contentpop.com/Community/George_Bush_isms.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://www.contentpop.com/Community/George_Bush_isms.aspx</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

