Comments on: Web 2.0 Starter Kit http://fastwonderblog.com/2006/08/13/web-20-starter-kit/ Thoughts on online community strategy, community management, blogging, social media, Yahoo Pipes and open source. Sun, 12 Feb 2012 20:44:51 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: GeekyGirl Dawn Foster http://fastwonderblog.com/2006/08/13/web-20-starter-kit/comment-page-1/#comment-322 GeekyGirl Dawn Foster Tue, 12 Dec 2006 03:07:50 +0000 http://fastwonderblog.com/?p=173#comment-322 llywrch,<br /><br />Actually, I am a huge fan of Wikipedia, and wikis in general. I almost included Wikipedia as a an exercise in the participation section of the web 2.0 starter kit. I decided not to include it only because I think that Wikipedia is an important resource, and I want people to contribute to it to share their expertise, but not as an exercise to learn about web 2.0. You Wikipedians do great stuff - keep it up! llywrch,

Actually, I am a huge fan of Wikipedia, and wikis in general. I almost included Wikipedia as a an exercise in the participation section of the web 2.0 starter kit. I decided not to include it only because I think that Wikipedia is an important resource, and I want people to contribute to it to share their expertise, but not as an exercise to learn about web 2.0. You Wikipedians do great stuff – keep it up!

]]> By: llywrch http://fastwonderblog.com/2006/08/13/web-20-starter-kit/comment-page-1/#comment-321 llywrch Tue, 12 Dec 2006 02:19:54 +0000 http://fastwonderblog.com/?p=173#comment-321 I'm curious about one omission in your post: in your list of ways to participate in Web 2.0, you omitted any mention of Wikipedia. Were you thinking of a specific Web 2.0 experience? Or has Wikipedia's reputation (admittedly only with certain groups of people) of being hostile to new users affected your choice of options? As an active & proud Wikipedian, I'd be interested in hearing about any bad experiences with this project.<br /><br />Geoff I’m curious about one omission in your post: in your list of ways to participate in Web 2.0, you omitted any mention of Wikipedia. Were you thinking of a specific Web 2.0 experience? Or has Wikipedia’s reputation (admittedly only with certain groups of people) of being hostile to new users affected your choice of options? As an active & proud Wikipedian, I’d be interested in hearing about any bad experiences with this project.

Geoff

]]> By: Raman http://fastwonderblog.com/2006/08/13/web-20-starter-kit/comment-page-1/#comment-320 Raman Tue, 07 Nov 2006 17:49:24 +0000 http://fastwonderblog.com/?p=173#comment-320 <a href='http://www.track-issue.com'>track-issue.com</a> is improving a lot day by day,and being a user I feel excited. track-issue.com is improving a lot day by day,and being a user I feel excited.

]]> By: Dave Lee http://fastwonderblog.com/2006/08/13/web-20-starter-kit/comment-page-1/#comment-319 Dave Lee Tue, 15 Aug 2006 01:00:51 +0000 http://fastwonderblog.com/?p=173#comment-319 hi dawn. the starter kit is great! I plan to refer to it often. I do have two suggestions. 1) Maybe look at getting a tinyurl or some other proxy url for the permalink so that it would be easier for people to refer to your great resource. 2) The only content change I'd make to the kit would be to add viewing Jon Udall's Heavy Medal Umlaut Movie about how Wikipedia works to the homework assignment. hi dawn. the starter kit is great! I plan to refer to it often. I do have two suggestions. 1) Maybe look at getting a tinyurl or some other proxy url for the permalink so that it would be easier for people to refer to your great resource. 2) The only content change I’d make to the kit would be to add viewing Jon Udall’s Heavy Medal Umlaut Movie about how Wikipedia works to the homework assignment.

]]>