<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sun Unlikely to Open Source Java</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fastwonderblog.com/2006/05/11/sun-unlikely-to-open-source-java/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fastwonderblog.com/2006/05/11/sun-unlikely-to-open-source-java/</link>
	<description>Consulting services for companies wanting to engage with online communities through social media.Focused on online communities, open technologies, open source, web 2.0, social media, RSS, blogging, and podcasting.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 05:20:52 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Patrick</title>
		<link>http://fastwonderblog.com/2006/05/11/sun-unlikely-to-open-source-java/comment-page-1/#comment-136</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 May 2006 13:08:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fastwonderblog.com/?p=108#comment-136</guid>
		<description>Can you name 5 specific benefits to Sun releasing Java under an FOSS license? Also, what do you want them to relicense: the language specification, the JVM (HotSpot) or the JDK/JRE (the libraries)? I rarely hear any specific benefits being listed. Cheers! Patrick</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can you name 5 specific benefits to Sun releasing Java under an FOSS license? Also, what do you want them to relicense: the language specification, the JVM (HotSpot) or the JDK/JRE (the libraries)? I rarely hear any specific benefits being listed. Cheers! Patrick</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
